Document Type : Research article


MSc student in Shahid Beheshti University


This Article investigates John Maxwell Coetzee’s three well known novels, Foe (1986), Disgrace (1999) and Life and Times of Michael K (1983) to analyze the colonial pattern of the marginal characters. The theoretical framework is based on Bhabha and Spivak concentrating on the economy of the male identity in post-colonial context. From Bhabha, notions like mimicry, hybridity and change and from Spivak the subaltern’s inaudibil-ity of voice are appropriated. Derrida’s idea of iterability is also applied. The intention is to follow the instances of mimicry and examine if Coet-zee’s literature manages to have political and ethical significance, as Spivak believes. It was concluded that resistance in Coetzee’s novels is an iterative moment signifying through recurring role reversions in the co-lonial discourse. Coetzee’s novels do not conclude with actualization of political betterment, yet the iterative quality of his significations invites us to reread his novels and reconsider the political and ethical questions. The ultimate meanings of his novels in the mind of the reader is inviting him to make political decisions, though seemingly metaphorical and apo-litical. 


Attridge, D. (1996). Oppressive silence: J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and the politics of canonisation. Critical Perspectives on J.M. Coetzee. Huggan, G. and Watson, S. (Ed.). London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Attwell, D. (1993). J. M. Coetzee: South Africa and the politics of writing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bhabha, Homi K. (1987). Of mimicry and men: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. The First Decade. Michelson, Krayss, Crimp, & Copjec (Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bhabha, Homi K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge. Print.
Bonnici, Th. (2001). Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999) and postcolonial power. Acta Scientiarum, Maringa. 23(1), 87-92.
Coetzee, J. M. (1986). Foe. New York: Penguin Books.
Coetzee, J. M. (1988). White writing: On the culture of letters in South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Coetzee, J. M. (1999). Disgrace. 1999. London: Martin Secker & Warburg. New York: Penguin.
Coetzee, J. M. (2003). He and his man. Online document.
Coetzee, J. M. (2004). Life and times of Michael K. Ravan Press. London: Vintage.
Defoe, D. (1720). Serious reflections during the life and surprising adventures of Robinson Crusoe: Romances and Narrative. London: J. M. Dent
Gordimer, N. (1984). The idea of gardening. New York Review of Books, 31 (3).
Gramsci, A. (1972). History of the subaltern classes: Methodological criteria. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G. (Ed.). New York: International. 52-60.
Head, D. (1997). J.M. Coetzee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kossew, S. (1996). Pen and power: A post-colonial reading of J.M. Coetzee and André Brink. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kossew, S. (1998). Critical essays on J.M. Coetzee. New York: G.K. Hall.
Mehrabadi, M., & Pirnajmuddin, H. (2006). (Hi)story in search of author(ity): Feminine narration in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe. Modern Literature, 29(2), 75-93.
Mullins, C. C. (2009). Silence as insubordination: Friday and Michael K’s wordless weapon, a post-colonial approach to J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and Life and Times of Michael K. Thesis. Marshall University. Print. / article=1744&context=etd/. Accessed 10 March 2014.
Parry, B. (1998). Speech and silence in the fictions of J. M. Coetzee. Writing South Africa: Literature, Apartheid, and Democracy, 1970–1995. Attridge, D. & Jolly, R. (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Poyner, J. (2006,a). J.M. Coetzee and the idea of the public intellectual. Athens: Ohio UP.
Poyner, J. (2006,b). J.M. Coetzee and the paradox of postcolonial authorship. Uk: Ashgate Publishing Co.
Rivkin, J., & Ryan, M. (Eds.). (2004). Literary theory: An anthology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schallenberg, M. (2011). Articulating substance: On silence and namelessness in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and Life & Times of Michael K. Thesis. Hogeschool. Print.
Spivak, G. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (Eds.). Urbana: University of Illinois. 271–313.
Spivak, G. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues, Harasym, S.(Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Spivak, G. (1991). Theory in the margin: Coetzee’s Foe reading Defoe’s Crusoe/Roxana. Consequences of Theory, Arac, J. & Johnson, B. (Eds.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 154–80.
Spivak, G. (2002): Ethics and politics in Tagore, Coetzee, and certain scenes of teaching. Diacritics. 32(3-4), 17-31.
Wang, M., & Tang, X. (2013). A road to grace: Homi Bhabhan reading of “Disgrace”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 293-299.