Ariel, M. (2002). The demise of a unique literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 361-402.
Bates, E. (1999). On the nature and nurture of language. In E. Bizzi, P. Calissano & V. Volterra (Eds.), Frontiers of biology: The brain of homo sapiens, (pp.241-265). Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana fondata da Giovanni Trecanni.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of language processing, (pp.3-73). Cambridge University Press.
Blasko, G. D., & Connine, C. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 295–308.
Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (1998). Frame-shifting and sentential integration. Technical report. CogSci, 98.03. Department of Cognitive Science, San Diego, CA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2636370_Frameshifting_and_Sentential_Integration
Erfaniyan Qonsuli, L., Sharifi, S., & Meshkatod Dini, M. (2014).Figurative language: A survey on the factors related to the semantic comprehension, their effectiveness and psychological reliability (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
Erfaniyan Qonsuli, L., & Sharifi, S. (forthcoming). Semantic comprehension of idioms, their effectiveness and psychological reliability. Review of Cognitive Linguistics.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. MIT Press.
Garnsey, S., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language,37, 58-93.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving twenty years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1982). A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourse. Text, 2, 9-27.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 524-533.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R., Buchalter, D., Moise, J., & Farrar, W. (1993). Literal meaning and figurative meaning. Discourse Processes, 16, 387-404.
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183-206.
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R., & Shaham, R. (2007). Expecting irony: Context versus salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 119-146.
Giora, R., Livnat, E., Fein, O., Barnea, A., Zeiman, R., & Berger, I. (2013). Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 89-115.
Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
Ivanko, S., & Pexman, P. M. (2001). Understanding irony: On-line processing of figurative and literal meaning. Poster presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse. University of California: Santa Barbara.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Wooley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
Kreuz, R, J., & Roberts, R. M. (1993). The empirical study of figurative language in literature. Poetics, 22, 151-169.
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249-308). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2008). Resisting contextual information: You can't put a salient meaning down. Paper presented at the international workshop: Towards an Experimental Pragmatics, University of Lyon.
Pexman P. M., Ferretti, T., & Katz, A. (2000). Discourse factors that inﬂuence irony detection during on-line reading. Discourse Processes, 29, 201-222.
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 47-61.
Thornton, R., MacDonald, M. C., & Arnold, J. E. (2000). The concomitant effects of phrase length and informational content in sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 195-203.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31-58). Cambridge University Press.