Proactive Form-Focused Instruction in a Flipped Classroom: Implicit and Explicit Grammar Knowledge Development and Retention

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Associate Professor, English Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

The present study investigated the possible effects of proactive form-focused instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ explicit and implicit grammar knowledge improvement in a flipped and a traditional class and also examined the effect of flipped class on explicit and implicit knowledge retention. Two classes were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 31) and a control (n = 28) group.  The former received proactive form-focused instruction through metalinguistic explanation in a flipped class, whereas the latter attended a traditional grammar class. Two implicit and two explicit knowledge tests were used to evaluate the learners’ explicit and implicit grammar knowledge development and retention. A set of pretests and two sets of posttests were administered immediately and four weeks after the last treatment session. Two mixed 3x2 multifactorial ANOVAs and post hoc tests were run to spot the differences in the measures between and within the groups. The results showed that both classes improved significantly in terms of learners’ implicit and explicit grammar knowledge. Furthermore, the experimental group showed a higher rate of knowledge retention. The findings can help and ensure language program designers, educational policymakers, and language teachers to capitalize on flipped courses to teach grammar effectively and help language learners retain both explicit and implicit grammar knowledge longer.

Keywords

References

  1. Afzali, Z., & Izadpanah, S. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on Iranian English foreign language learners: Engagement and motivation in English language grammar. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1870801
  2. Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 9-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423339
  3. Amiryousefi, M. (2019). The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners’ L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307
  4. Asaka, S., Shinozaki, F., & Yoshida, H. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom approach on EFL Japanese junior high school students’ performances and attitudes. International Journal of Heritage, Art, and Multimedia, 1(3), 71-87. https://cutt.ly/qEaTxAG
  5. Badrkhani, P. (2021). How a catastrophic situation turns into an exceptional opportunity: Covid-19 pandemic in Iran and challenges of online education for new English language educators. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1956545
  6. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
  7. Bezzazi, R. (2019). Learning English grammar through flipped learning. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 170-184. https://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/view/597
  8. Bouwmeester, R. A. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., van den Berg, I. E. T., ten Cate, O. T. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Westerveld, H. E. (2019). Flipping the medical classroom: Effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Computers & Education, 139(1), 118-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.002
  9. Bowles, M. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute?  Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756
  10. Bulut, C., & Kocoglu, Z. (2020). The flipped classroom's effect on EFL learners' grammar knowledge. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(4), 69-84. https://bit.ly/2XxL8AX                                                           
  11. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces improved transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118-1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902
  12. Cherney, I. D. (2008). The effects of active learning on students' memories for course content. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408090841
  13. Cilliers, L., &   Pylman, J. (2020). South African students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom: A case study of higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(3), 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1853588   
  14. Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91-115. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1051042.pdf
  15. Craik, F. I. M. (1973). A levels of analysis view of memory. In P. Pliner, L. Kramer, & M. Alloway (Eds.), Communication and affect: Language and thought (pp. 45-65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558250-6.50010-9
  16. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
  17. De Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002064
  18. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Explicit and implicit learning. In C. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Blackwell. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch11
  19. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover.
  20. Ellis, N. C. (2017). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In J. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism. Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed., pp. 113-124). Springer.
  21. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002073
  22. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x
  23. Ellis, R. (2008). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00184.x
  24. Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-003
  25. Ellis, R., & Loewen, S. (2007). Confirming the operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005): Responding to Isemonger. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070052
  26. Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1668-1706.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097
  27. Francis, J. (2017). The effects of technology on student motivation and engagement in classroom-based learning [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England]. https://dune.une.edu/theses/121.
  28. Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142
  29. Graham, K. L., Cohen, A., Reynolds, E. E., & Huang, G. C. (2019). Effect of a flipped classroom on knowledge acquisition and retention in an internal medicine residency program. Journal of graduate medical education, 11(1), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00536.1
  30. Haynie, W. J. (2007). Effects of test taking on retention learning in technology education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Technology Education, 18(2), 24-36.  https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v18i2.a.2
  31. Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (2005). Investigating instructed second language acquisition. In A. Housen, & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp.1-27). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372
  32. Hulstijn, J. H., & de Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97-112. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.428191
  33. Izadpanah, S., & Afzali, Z. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on critical thinking and performance of Iranian EFL learners in learning grammar. Journal of Language Horizons, 6(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2021.32997.1362
  34. Kang, N. (2015). The comparison between regular and flipped classrooms for EFL Korean adult learners. Multimedia- Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 41-72. https://doi.org/10.15702/MALL.2015.18.3.41
  35. Kang, S. H. K. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 12-19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624708
  36. Kang, E. Y., Sok, S., & Han, Z. H. (2019). Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 428-453.
  37. Khezrlou, S. (2021). Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’ written accuracy and fluency through task repetition. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 568-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656765
  38. King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side.  College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080104
  39. Lee, A. H. (2021). The effects of proactive form-focused instruction and individual differences on second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211051032
  40. Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.372
  41. Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693-722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000796  
  42. Lichtman, K. (2016). Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners? Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 707-730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000598
  43. Lindseth, M. (2016). The effects of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of subject-verb inversion in German. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12174
  44. Liu, C., Sands-Meyer, S., & Audran, J. (2019). The effectiveness of the student response system (SRS) in English grammar learning in flipped English as a foreign language (EFL) class. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1178-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1528283
  45. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18
  46. McLaughlin , E. J. (2018). Flipped classrooms, by design. Medical Education, 52(9), 887-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13654
  47. Morton, D. A., & Colbert-Getz, J. M. (2016). Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(2), 170-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1635   
  48. Noroozi, A., Rezvani, E., & Ameri-Golestan, A. (2020). The effect of flipped classrooms on L2 learners' development and retention of grammatical knowledge. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803344
  49. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness in L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
  50. Nourinezhad, S., Hadipourfard, E., & Bavali, M. (2022). The effect of flipped learning on English writing performance and self-efficacy of Iranian medical students. Journal of Language Horizons, 6(1), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2021.34132.1409
  51. O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
  52. Prull, M. W., Lawless, C., Marshall, H. M., & Sherman, A. T. K. (2016). Effects of divided attention at retrieval on conceptual implicit memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00005
  53. Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2018). Form-focused instruction. In P. Garrett & J. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 40-56). Routledge.
  54. Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners' interpretations and L2 development: A case of Persian EFL learners, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1275702
  55. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219
  56. Roehling, P. V. (2018). Flipping the college classroom: An evidence-based guide. Palgrave.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69392-7
  57. Saito, K. (2013). Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000666
  58. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x
  59. Schwieren, J., Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2017). The testing effect in the psychology classroom: A meta-analytic perspective. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717695149
  60. Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 253-286. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064002253
  61. Shatto, B., LʼEcuyer, K., & Quinn, J. (2017). Retention of content utilizing a flipped classroom approach. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(4), 206-208.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000138
  62. Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44(2), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000224
  63. Tamayo, R., & Frensch, P. A. (2007). Interference produces different forgetting rates for implicit and explicit knowledge. Experimental Psychology, 54(4), 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.304
  64. Toni, A., & Hassaskhah, J. (2018). Form-focused skill training in EFL speaking pedagogy: Empirical counterevidence to trade-off hypothesis. Revista de Educación, 380, 9-41. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-380-371
  65. Trahey, M., & Spada, N. (2020). Focusing on language and content with adolescent English language learners in the mainstream classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 76(3), 218-242. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2019-0009
  66. Tunney, R. J. (2003). Implicit and explicit knowledge decay at different rates: A dissociation between priming and recognition in artificial grammar learning. Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1026/1618-3169.50.2.124
  67. Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
  68. Vaezi, R., Afghari, A., & Lotfi, A. (2019). Flipped teaching: Iranian students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Applied Research on English Language, 8(1), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.114131.1382
  69. Vitta, J. P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). The flipped classroom in second language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981403
  70. Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2016). Does the flipped classroom lead to increased gains on learning outcomes in ESL/EFL contexts? CATESOL Journal, 28(1), 39-67. http://www.catesoljournal.org/wp content/uploads/2016/06/CJ28.1_webb.pdf
  71.   Woolfolk, A., & Margetts, K. (2016). Educational psychology (4th Ed.). Pearson Education Australia.
  72. Xu, J. & Li, C. (2021). The effects of the timing of form-focused instruction on EFL learners’ learning of difficult and easy grammatical features: A comparative study. System, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102612
  73. Xu, H., & Lyster, R. (2014). Differential effects of explicit form-focused instruction on morphosyntactic development. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863899
  74. Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics