نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه الزهرا

2 کارشناسی ارشد زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه الزهرا

چکیده

به استضعاف کشیدن زنان، به عنوان جنس دوم و ضعیف­تر، و استثمار طبیعت محور‌ اصلی اغلب مطالعات اکوفمینیستی بوده­ اند. مقاله حاضر به تحلیل بی‌عدالتی مردسالارانه غلبه­ کننده بر زنان و طبیعت در اثر ادبی قرن هجدهم میلادی، تاراج طره مو(1719) از الکساندر پوپ می‌پردازد. با بهره­ جستن از رویکرد اکوفمینیستی فرهنگی، این مقاله سعی ­بر­ آن­ دارد که شکل‌گیری و نیز ارتباط متقابل دوگانگی‌های کهن فرهنگی- برتری جنسیت­گرایانه مرد بر زن و نیز برتری انسان­محوری انسان بر غیرانسان - را در عالم­ صغیر این متن ادبی از حیطه­ ی ادبیات قرن هجده انگلستان به ­تصویر بکشد. بر ­همین­ اساس، با تکیه بر نظریه اکوفمینیسم فرهنگی از وَل­پلاموود، ابعاد فمینیستی-اکولوژیک شعر مورد بحث قرار­ خواهد­ گرفت. در قالب این چهارچوب نظری، نشان­ خواهیم ­داد که چگونه عناصر یک سیستم مردسالارانه به تمامی فردیت­ های زنانه شکل ­می­بخشند. علاوه ­بر ­این، این مقاله نشان می­دهد که چگونه خود طبیعت، به ­عنوان اعتراض به فرهنگ مردسالارانه، در مقام حمایت از زنان در تاراج طره مو ایفای­ نقش می­نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Birkeland, J. (1993). Ecofeminism: Linking theory and practice. In G. Gaard (Ed.), Ecofeminism: women, animals, nature (pp. 13-59). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bowerbank, S. (2005). Speaking for nature: Women and ecologies of early modern England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Boyle, R. (1996). A free enquiry into the vulgarly received notion of nature. In E. B. Davis & M. Hunter (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bushnell, R. (2003). Green desire: Imagining early modern English gardens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Buzard, J. (1993). The Beaten track: European tourism, literature, and ways to ‘culture’ 1800-1918. Victorian Review, 11(2), 77-9.
Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Clark, T. (2011) The Cambridge introduction to literature and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collard, A. & Contrucci, J. (1989). Rape of the wild. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
Cranston, M. (1994). The Romantic movement. Massachusetts, MA: Blackwell.
Eaton, H. & Lorentzen, L.A. (Eds.). (2003). Ecofeminism and globalization: exploring culture, context, and religion. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Fuss, D. (1989). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature, and difference. New York: Routledge.
Gaard, G. (Ed.). (1993). Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Gilpin, W. (1972). On picturesque beauty: Essays on picturesque beauty. London: R. Blamire.
Griffin, S. (1982). Made from this earth: An anthology of writings. New York: Harper & Row.
Hazarika, K. (2012). Social status of women in the 18th-century English society as reflected in a dictionary of the English language of Dr. Johnson. IJCAES Special Issue on Basic, Applied & Social Sciences, 2, 352-355. Doi:10.1.1.303.1903  
Hill, B. (1984). Eighteenth-century women: An anthology. London: George Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd.
Kerrigan, J. (1998). Earth writing: Seamus Heaney and Ciaran Carson. Essays in Criticism. 48(2), 144-168.
Ling, C. (2014). Ecological criticism based on social gender: The basic principles of Ecofeminism. Higher Education of Social Science, 7(1), 67-72.
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Merrens, R. (1996). A nature of ‘infinite sense and reason’: Margaret Cavendish’s natural philosophy and the ‘noise’ of a feminized nature. Women’s Studies, 25(5), 421–438.
Milton, J. (2003). Paradise lost: The major work. In S. Orgel & J. Goldberg (Eds.), Oxford world classics: John Milton (355-618). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mulvey, L. (1998). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In J. Rivkin & M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory: An anthology (pp. 57-68). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
Munroe, J. & Laroche R. (Eds.). (2011). Ecofeminism approaches to early modernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parham, J. (2010). Green man Hopkins: Poetry and the Victorian ecological imagination. New York: Rodopi.
Phillips, B. (2004). The rape of mother earth in seventeenth-century English poetry: An ecofeminist interpretation. Atlantis, 26(1), 49-60.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (1992). Feminism and ecofeminism: Beyond the dualistic assumptions of women, men, and nature. The Ecologist, 22(1), 8-13.
Pope, A. (2004). The rape of the lock. London: Sovereign Sanctuary Press.
Rao, S. (2010). Belinda’s weapons of femininity in Pope’s The Rape of the Lock. Magnificat: a Journal of Undergraduate Nonfiction. Retrieved from https://www.commons.marymount.e Greta Gaard du/magnificat/belindas-weapons-of-femininity-in-popes-the-rape-of-the-lock.
Salma, U. (2011). Woman and the empire in Alexander Pope’s The Rape of the Lock: A reading. Transnational Literature, 4(1).
Retrieved from http://fhrc.flinders.edu.au/transnational/home.html.
Sandilands, C. (1999). The good-natured feminist: Ecofeminism and the quest for democracy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Snyder, W. C. (1992). Mother nature’s other natures: Landscape in women’s writing, 1770-1830. Women’s Studies, 21(2), 143-62.
Storey, G. (2017). Belinda, Thalestris, Clarissa,… Queen Anne? Failures of female agency in The Rape of the Lock. The Midwest Quarterly, 58(2), 203-219.
Tillotson, G. (Ed.). (1962). The rape of the lock and other poems. New York: Routledge.
Twine, T. R. (2001). Ecofeminism in process. Retrieved from www.ecofem.org/journal.
Tosh, J. (1999). A man’s place: Masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England. London: Yale University Press.
Weaver, C. (1985). Parallels between new paradigms in science and in reading and literarytheories: An essay review. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(3), 298-316.
Westfall, C. (1998). The negative images of women in Pope’s The Rape of the Lock. Knox College Common Room: The Knox College Online Journal of Literary Criticism, 2(2), 1-4. Retrieved from http://departments.knox.edu/engdept/CommonRoom/The_Common_Room_Home.html.