نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی
2 وزارت آموزش و پرورش، آذربایجان غربی
چکیده
هم اکنون فناوری موبایل به طور گسترده ای برای کمک به یادگیری و آموزش استفاده می شود. در این تحقیق، تلاش شده تا تاثیر یک ابزارک خواندن بر درک خواندن و خودکار آمدی زبان آموزان ایرانی مطالعه شود. بدین منظور، 56 زبان آموز در یک موسسه ی زبان خصوصی انتخاب شدند و در دو گروه آزمون و شاهد قرار گرفتند. زبان آموزان گروه آزمون ده متن را به صورت مستقل خواندند و برای درک معنی متن از ابزارک خواندن کمک گرفتند. گروه شاهد همان ده متن را خواند و از معلم برای درک متن و واژه ها کمک گرفتند. هر دو گروه امتحان PET و مقیاس خودکارآمدی خواندن را قبل و بعد از خواندن متن تکمیل نمودند. نتایج تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیره مشخص کرد که خواندن مستقل با استفاده از ابزارک خواندن بر روی درک خواندن و خودکارآمدی زبان آموز تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. نتایج را میتوان به کمک نظریه ی شناختی یادگیری چندرسانه ای تبیین کرد. به علاوه کاربرد این تحقیق برای دبیران و زبان آموزان در بهبود مهارت خواندن و خودکارامدی است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 199-226. doi:10.1080/09588220802090246
Agbatogun, A. O. (2014). Developing learners’ second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17, 257-269.
Al Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5, 202-232.
Alzubi, A. A. F., Singh, M. K. M., & Hazaea, A. N. (2019). Investigating reading learning strategies through smartphones on Saudi learners’ psychological autonomy in reading context. International Journal of Instruction, 12, 1-16.
Anderson, S. L., & Betz, N. E. (2001). Sources of social self-efficacy expectations: Their measurement and relation to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 98-117.
Arslan, A. (2012). Predictive power of the sources of primary school students' self-efficacy beliefs on their self-efficacy beliefs for learning and performance. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12, 1915-1920.
Arslan, A. (2013). Investigation of relationship between sources of self-efficacy beliefs of secondary school students and some variables. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13, 1983-1993.
Banditvilai, C. (2000). Utilizing the Internet as an integral part of teaching reading. Reflections, 2, 47-57.
Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28, 12-29.
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41, 1389-1391.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). England: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 287-310.
Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 129-142. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/blake.pdf
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 153-164.
Caldwell, M. (2018). Japanese university students’ perceptions on the use of ICT and mobile-learning in an EFL setting. CALL-EJ, 19, 187-212.
Castagnaro, A. V. (2012). Evaluating sixth graders' self-efficacy in response to the use of educational technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA. Retrieved from https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/69/. doi:10.5642/cguetd/69
Castaneda, D. A., & Cho, M. H. (2016). Use of a game-like application on a mobile device to improve accuracy in conjugating Spanish verbs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 1195-1204.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chen, J. M., Chen, M. C., & Sun, Y. S. (2010). A novel approach for enhancing student reading comprehension and assisting teacher assessment of literacy. Computers & Education, 55, 1367-1382.
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 277-299. doi:10.1002/rrq.50
Chi, C. C., Kuo, C. H., & Peng, C. C. (2007). The designing of a web page recommendation system for EFL. Proceeding of Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’07), Niigata, Japan, 730-734.
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 9-16.
Chun, D. M. (2006). CALL technologies for L2 reading. Calling on CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 7-98.
Cohen, A., & Ezra, O. (2018). Development of a contextualised MALL research framework based on L2 Chinese empirical study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 764-789.
Dashtestani, R. (2016). Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students' use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 815-832.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
Fisher, T., Pemberton, R., Sharples, M., Ogata, H., Uosaki, N., Edmonds, P., Hull, A., & Tschorn, P. (2009). Mobile learning of vocabulary from reading novels: A comparison of three modes. Proceedings of 8th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, USA, 191-194.
Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The effectiveness of using mobile on EFL learners’ reading practices in Najran University. English Language Teaching, 9, 8-21.
Henderson, M., Huang, H., Grant, S., & Henderson, L. (2012). The impact of Chinese language lessons in a virtual world on university students' self-efficacy beliefs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 400-419.
Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43, 154-167.
Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 1-21.
Hsieh, Y. (2019). Effects of video captioning on EFL vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32, 1-23, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1577898
Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327-336.
Kissau, K. (2012). Structuring migrants' political activities on the internet: A two-dimensional approach. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 1381-1403.
Kongsuebchart, J., & Suppasetseree, S. (2018). The effect of a weblog-based electronic portfolio on Thai EFL undergraduate students’ English writing skills. CALL-EJ, 19, 28-46.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revised and updated version]. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, England: Wiley.
Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 207-218.
Lai, C., & Zheng, D. (2018). Self-directed use of mobile devices for language learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 30, 299-318.
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769-782.
Levy, M. (2018). Design. In I. Liontas (Ed.) The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-6). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0399
Lin, C. C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48-59.
Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: Towards context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, E1-E9.
Liu, G. Z., Chen, J. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Mobile-based collaborative learning in the fitness center: A case study on the development of English listening comprehension with a context-aware application. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 305-320.
Luo, S., & Sun, X. (2018). A case study on intermediate CSL learners’ word recognition processes and strategies in contextual reading settings. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41, 288-305.
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education. Medical Education, 44, 543-549.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43-71). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles of reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 279-315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2018). Vocabulary learning through viewing video: The effect of two enhancement techniques. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 1-26.
Motteram, G. (2013). Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. London, England: British Council.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44, 167-180.
Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pajares, F. (1996). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp.1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pajares, F., Johnson, J. M., & Usher, L. E. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 105-120.
Park, J., Yang, J., & Hsieh, Y. C. (2014). University level second language readers’ online reading and comprehension strategies. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 148-172.
Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: languages, literacies and cultures. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pegrum, M. (2016). Future directions in mobile learning. In D. Churchill, J. Lu, T. K. F. Chiu, & B. Fox. (Eds.), Mobile learning design (pp. 413-431). Singapore: Springer.
Piercey, R. R. (2013). Reading self-efficacy in early adolescence: Which measure works best? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Retrieved from https://sites.education.uky.edu/motivation/files/2013/09/Piercey_Dissertation_71813.pdf
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33.
Ramezanali, N., & Faez, F. (2019). Vocabulary learning and retention through multimedia glossing. Language Learning & Technology, 23, 105-124. https://doi.org/10125/44685
Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219-235.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell and N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1329-1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Şahin Kızıl, A., & Savran, Z. (2018). Assessing self-regulated learning: The case of vocabulary learning through information and communication technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 599-616.
Samuels, J. (2003). Wireless and handheld devices for language learning. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, USA. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/03_50.pdf
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281-303). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Gunn, T. P. (1986). Self-efficacy and skill development: Influence of task strategies and attributions. The Journal of Educational Research, 79, 238-244.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2001). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Scott, D., & Beadle, S. (2014). Improving the effectiveness of language learning: CLIL and computer assisted language learning (Report No. J60173). London, England: European Commission.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 284-303.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In H. van der Merwe & T. Brown (Eds.), Mobile technology: The future of learning in your hands (p. 58). Cape Town, South Africa: mLearn.
Soe, K., Koki, S., & Chang, J. M. (2000). Effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on reading achievement: A meta-analysis (Report No. ED 443079). Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 365-383.
Torut, S., & Torut, B. (2002). The development of computer multimedia English lessons for academic purposes (Unpublished master’s thesis). Silpakorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tsai, S. C. (2017). Effectiveness of ESL students' performance by computational assessment and role of reading strategies in courseware-implemented business translation tasks. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 474-487.
Tseng, J. J. (2018). Exploring TPACK-SLA interface: Insights from the computer-enhanced classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 3, 390-412.
University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. (2007). PET handbook for teachers. Cambridge, England: Author.
Van Horne, S., Russell, J-E., & Schuh, K. L. (2016). The adoption of mark-up tools in an interactive e-textbook reader, Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 407-433. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9425-x.
Wei, Q., Siriyothin, P., & Lian, A. P. (2018). Chinese university EFL students’ perceptions of learner autonomy in language learning. Beyond Words, 6, 26-40.
Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267-276. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.517150.
Wu, Y. T., & Wang, L. J. (2016) Research trends in technology-enhanced knowledge building pedagogies: A review of selected empirical research from 2006 to 2015. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0065-2
Zarei, A. A., & Hashemipour, M. (2015). The effect of computer-assisted language instruction on improving EFL learners’ autonomy and motivation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 40-58.
Zhang, H., & Koda, K. (2018). Vocabulary knowledge and morphological awareness in Chinese as a Heritage Language (CHL) reading comprehension ability. Reading and Writing, 31, 53-74.
Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Brewer, R. A., & Wagner, M. (2009). Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds. CALICO Journal 27, 205-231.
)