نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
2 استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
3 استادیارگروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه زنجان. زنجان. ایران.
چکیده
این پژوهش در پی بررسی کارآمدی بازخورد اصلاحی وابسته به تابلوی هوشمند در مقایسه با بازخورد اصلاحی مبتنی بر کاغذ برای گسترش واژگان زبان انگلیسی ایرانی بودهاست. به این منظور، نمونهای از 80 زبانآموز انگلیسی با مهارت متوسط بر مبنای نمرة بهدستآمده از یک آزمون مهارت زبانی انتخاب شدند. سپس شرکتکنندهها، به صورت تصادفی به سه گروه دستهبندی شدند: دو گروه آزمایشی و یک گروه کنترل. نخستین گروه آزمایشی (تعداد= 30) در حالی که بازخورد اصلاحی وابسته به تابلو هوشمند را دریافت میکردند، مورد آموزش واژگان هدف قرار گرفتند، و گروه آزمودنی دوم (تعداد= 25) در حالی که بازخورد اصلاحی مبتنی بر کاغذ دریافت میکردند، مورد آموزش واژگان هدف قرار گرفتند؛ گروه کنترل که مورد آموزش واژههای هدف قرار گرفتند، هیچ بازخوردی از هیچ نوعی دریافت نکردند. یافتههای آزمون تحلیل واریانس نشان داد که بازخورد اصلاحی مبتنی بر کاغذ ، اندکی، یادگیری واژگان هدف به وسیلة شرکتکنندگان را بهبود بخشیدهاست. ولی، روش بازخورد اصلاحی وابسته به تابلوی هوشمند، تأثیر معناداری در این زمینه نشان دادهاست. یافتهها میتوانند بیانگر دیدگاههای نوآورانانهای در حوزة یادگیری زبان به کمک فناوری و فناوریهای جدید در آموزش زبان دوم فراهم آورد.
کلیدواژهها
- Abraham, L. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090246
- AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 76-95. https://doi:10.1111/jcal.12004
- Adigüzel, T., Capraro, R. M., & Wilson, V. L. (2011). An examination of teacher acceptance of handheld computers. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 12-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ958994.pdf
- Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 3(2), 115-125. https://ijreeonline.com/article-1-120-en.pdf
- Albaaly, E., & Higgin, S. (2012). The impact of interactive whiteboard technology on medical students’ achievement in ESL essay writing: An early study in Egypt. The Language Learning Journal, 2(47), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.543953
- Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
- Alshaikhi, M. H. (2017). Investigating teachers’ attitudes towards the effectiveness of using interactive whiteboards when teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of Modern Education Review, 7(3), 210-219. http://www.academicstar.us/
- Amiri, R., & Sharifi, M. (2014). The influence of using interactive whiteboard on writings of EFL students regarding adverbs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.413
- Amolo, S., & Dees, E. (2007). The influence of interactive whiteboards on fifth-grade student perceptions and learning experiences. Action Research Exchange, 6(1), 1-9. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/189470194.pdf
- Bacon, D. (2011). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Information Technology in Education Journal, 15-18.
- Barani, G. (2013). The impact of computer assisted language learning (CALL) on vocabulary achievement of Iranian university students EFL learners. International Journal of Basic Science & Applied Research, 2(5), 531-537. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3DBarani%2C%2BGH.%2B%282013
- Barcroft, J. (2004). Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(4), 303-334. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F0267658304sr233oa
- Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898010.pdf
- Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.V8N51.2000
- BECTA (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf
- Beeland, W. D. Jr. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help? Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teaching Education, Trinity College, Dublin. http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/research/international_research/usa/beeland_am.pdf
- Brown, S. (2009). Interactive whiteboards in education. JISC Technologies Centre, Joint Information Systems Committee. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Interactivewhiteboards.pdf
- Bull, S. (2000). Focusing on feedback. In E. Broady (Ed.), Second language writing in a computer environment (pp. 157-175). CILT.
- Caws, C. (2006). Assessing group interactions online: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Learning Design, 1(3), 19-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066482.pdf
- Coady, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Mokhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 217-228). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
- Cojocnean, D. M. (2015). The vocabulary learning behavior of Romanian high school students in a digital context. University of Exeter. https://core.ac.uk/reader/43095640
- Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press.
- Dashtestani, S. R. (2019). Teaching EFL with interactive whiteboards: Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks? Journal of Language Horizons, 3(1), 207-224. https://dx.doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2019.26689.1139
- Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
- Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology 14(3), 51-71. http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num3/elolaoskoz.pdf
- Ertan, Y., Yucel, E., Kara, E., & Karabiyik, L. (2011). The effects of interactive whiteboard usage on students’ learning level and application in financial markets courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 12(3), 23-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/156032
- Faghih, E., & Hosseini, S. B. (2012). Asynchronous computer-mediated corrective feedback and the correct use of definite/indefinite articles. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 9(1), 21-36. https://itdl.org/Journal/Jan_12/Jan_12.pdf
- Gatlin, M. (2007). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on student achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia, Athens.
- http://athenaeum.libs.uga.edu
- Ghaniabadi, S., Amirian, S. M. R., Khalilabad, M. H., & Nafchi, A. M. (2016). The effect of multimedia texts presented on interactive whiteboards on Iranian high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 430-446. http://www.ijhcs.com/index
- Ghazi, S., & Zamanian, M. (2019). The influence of asynchronous computer-mediated versus conventional corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 8(1), 169-181. http://jslte.iaushiraz.ac.ir/article_684620_5221df3c95fcab9501241d8cce09bb47.pdf
- Ghufron, M. A. (2019). Exploring an automated feedback program ‘Grammarly’ and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing assessment: Modern vs. traditional assessment. In D. Mulyadi, R. Rahim, S. Aimah, Y. Nugraheni, M. Ifadah, & H. D., Santoso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd English language and literature international conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019. (pp. 307-315). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.27-4-2019.2285308
- Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 60-81. http://llt.msu.edu/%20vol4num1/groot/
- Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00118.x
- Han, Z. H. (2001). Fine-tuning corrective feedback. Foreign Language Annals 34(6), 582-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02105.x
- Henderson, C. (2019). The effect of feedback timing on L2 Spanish vocabulary acquisition in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819832907
- Ho, M., & Savignon, S. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269-290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24147912
- Hodge, S., & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive white board: A teacher's journey. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511123
- Hulstijn, J. (2000). The use of computer technology in experimental studies of second language acquisition: A survey of some techniques and some ongoing studies. Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 32-43. http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num2/hulstijn/index.html
- Katwibun, H. (2013). Using an interactive whiteboard in vocabulary teaching. Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 116, 674-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.278
- Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). Analyzing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00244.x
- Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2020). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820912354
- Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
- Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield. http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
- Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9070-z
- Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24-40). Routledge.
- Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600803311
- Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
- Long, M. H. (2006). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lu, F. L., (2010). English learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition in the video-based CALL program. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 51-66. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/English-Learners-%E2%80%99-Incidental-Vocabulary-in-the-Lin/bbeb7ee19e31932c3bb125c39bcd381feea729ee
- Lyster, R. (1998a). Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51-81. https//doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X
- Lyster, R. (1998b). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183-218.
- Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
- Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. https//doi.org/ 10.1017/S0261444812000365
- Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600803998
- McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
- Mechling, L., Gast, D., & Krupa, K. (2007). Impact of smart board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 37(10), 1869-1882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0361-9
- Moss, G., Carrey, J., Levaaic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the school’s whiteboard expansion (SWE) project: London challenge. Institute of Education, University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10022066/1/Moss2007whiteboardsRR816.pdf
- Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 416-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541721
- Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
- Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82. https://www.lextutor.ca/cover/papers/nation_2006.pdf
- Oberg, A. (2011). Comparison of the effectiveness of a CALL-based approach and a card-based approach to vocabulary acquisition and retention. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 118-144. https://journal.equinoxpub.com/Calico/article/download/17080/19555
- Pan, Y. (2010). The effect of teacher error feedback on the accuracy of EFL student writing. TEFLIN Journal, 21(1), 57-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v21i1/57-77
- Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patters of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588241
- Rabiee, M. (2010). Facilitating learning to gather in Iranian context: Three collaborative oral feedback models in EFL writing classes. Sino-US English Teaching, 7(3), 10-22. https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/55a7797332a74.pdf
- Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004
- Razagifard, P., & Rahimpour, M. (2010). The effect of computer mediated corrective feedback on the development of second language learners’ grammar. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning 7(5). 11-30. http://itdl.org/Journal/May_2010/article2002.htm
- Razagifard, P., & Razzaghifard, V. (2011). Corrective feedback in a computer-mediated communicative context and the development of second language grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 11(2), 1-17. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-9a758c3e-8f18-4945-8e7b-d7a8cecf16d7
- Sachs, R., & Suh, B. R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 199-227). Oxford University Press.
- Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2019). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164
- Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96-120. http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/sauro.pdf
- Schmid, E., C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.005
- Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
- Selwyn N. (2003). ICT in non-formal youth and adult education: Defining territory. OECD/NCAL International roundtable. http://www.literacy.org/ICTconf/OECD_Selwy n_final.pdf
- Seiffedin, A. H., & El-Sakka, S. M. F. (2017). The impact of direct-indirect corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 166-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.02
- Shams, N., & Dabaghi, A. (2014). Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: The effect of online annotations via interactive whiteboards. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 6(14), 37-56. https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_3321_6cfae049799c952431aa32715f2a18e9.pdf
- Shaqaqi, M., & Soleimani, H. (2018). Effects of asynchronous and conventional paper-and-pen metalinguistic feedback on L2 learners' use of verb tense. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 5(3), 55-72. https://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1680_9eacb35cd225e9ba3faef4d34daecd1a.pdf
- Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361-392. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F1362168806lr203oa
- Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
- Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 593-610). Routledge. https://moodle.phooe.at/pluginfile.php/144864/mod_resource/content/1/Hinkel_2011_Handbook_of_Research_in_SLA_2.pdf#page=612
- research in second language teaching and learning
- Shen, C., & Chuang, H. (2009). An investigation on user communication behavior in an interactive whiteboard technology environment. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 8(1), 184-195. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/communications/2009/31-815.pdf
- Sippel, L. (2019). The impact of peer corrective feedback on vocabulary development. Foreign Language Annals, 52(3), 595-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12416
- Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321-1341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.006
- Souhila, B., & Khadidja, M. M. (2013). We need change! The interactive whiteboard in the EFL context. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 379-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n3p379
- Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.012
- SMART Technologies Inc. (2006). Interactive whiteboards and learning improving student learning outcomes and streamlining lesson planning. http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/education/pdf/interactivewhiteboardsandlearning.pdf
- Swan, K., Schenker, J. & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 3290-3297). VieAssociation for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28842/
- Tafazoli, D., Nosratzadeh, H., & Hosseini, N. (2014). Computer-mediated corrective feedback in ESP courses: Reducing grammatical errors via Email. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(9), 355-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.341
- Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students' self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(2), 379-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.019
- Turel, Y. K. (2011). An interactive whiteboard student survey: Development, validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2441-2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.005
- Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00508.x
- Ware, P. D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. (pp. 105-122). Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ware,+P.+D.,+%26+Warschauer,+M.+(2006).&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
- Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00699.x
- Yeh, S., & Lo, J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52(4), 882-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014
- Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.523285