نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه مترجمی زبان، موسسه آموزش عالی طلوع مهر، قم، ایران

چکیده

خود-تنظیمی آکادمیک فرایندی است که در آن زبان‌آموزان از بازخورد شناختی، عاطفی، رفتاری و انگیزشی برای تنظیم یا اصلاح رفتارها و راهبردها برای دست‌یابی به هدف‌های خود استفاده ‌می‌کنند. به‌ این ترتیب، یادگیری خود-تنظیم‌یافته فرایندی در تعیین اهداف، برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی، انتخاب و استفاده از راهبردها، نظارت بر کارامدی فرد و ارزیابی خویش است. بر این مبنا، این پژوهش به تأثیر آموزش خود-تنظیمی بر اساس راهبرد تفکر قبل، حین و بعد خواندن از طریق توسعه راهبرد خود-تنظیم‌ یافته بر خود-تنظیمی فراگیران انگلیسی سطح متوسط در خواندن انگلیسی به عنوان زبان دوم متن‌های توضیحی می‌پردازد. توسعه راهبرد خود-تنظیم‌یافته، برای راهبرد تفکر قبل و حین و بعد خواندن در جلسه‌های خواندن زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان دوم گروه آزمایشی دست‌نخورده پیاده‌سازی شد، ولی به گروه کنترل دست‌نخورده آموزش‌ معمول خواندن زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان دوم داده شد، با این هدف که آنها متون را بخوانند و به سؤال‌های درک مطلب آن پاسخ دهند. داده‌های خود-تنظیمی با استفاده از پرسشنامه پارامتری راهبردهای انگیزشی تنظیم‌شده برای یادگیری قبل و بعد از آموزش گردآوری شد. تحلیل کوواریانس یک‌طرفه نشان‌داد که آموزش خود-تنظیمی مبتنی‌ بر راهبرد تفکر قبل و حین و بعد خواندن از طریق رشد راهبرد خود-تنظیم‌یافته می‌تواند مهارت خواندن خود-تنظیمی زبان‌آموزان را تقویت‌کند. این یافته‌ها می‌تواند معلمان را ترغیب‌ کند که در آموزش زبان انگلیسی به زبان آموزان در رشد راهبرد خود-تنظیمی برای راهبرد تفکر قبل و حین و بعد خواندن و کسب توانایی خود-تنظیمی فرایند خواندن زبان انگلیسی کمک کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

  1. Allen, E. D., Bernhardt, E. B., Berry, M. Th., & Demel, M. (1988). Comprehension and text genre: An analysis of secondary school foreign language readers. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04178.x
  2. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199- 231. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
  3. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press.
  4. Chamot, A. U. (2014, December). Developing self-regulated learning in the language classroom. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, & T. Suthiwan (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2014 (pp. 78-88). Singapore University. http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/cls/CLaSIC/clasic2014/Proceedings/chamot_annauhl.pdf
  5. DuBay, W. H. (Ed.) (2006). Classical readability studies. Impact Information.
  6. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Williams, J., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279-320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
  7. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. 
  8. Grabe, W. (2014). Key issues in L2 reading development. Proceedings of the 4th CELC Symposium for English Language Teachers-Selected Papers (pp. 8-18). National University of Singapore. http://www.nus.edu.sg/celc/research/books/4th%20Symposium%20proceedings/2).%20William%20Grabe.pdf
  9. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2007). Best practices in teaching planning. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 119-140).  Guilford Press.
  10. Hamoulah Mardani, N., & Afghari, A. (2017). Self-regulated strategy development (SRSD)
  11. and the reading process: Effects on reading and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(6), 192-200. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/673
  12. Harris, K. R. , & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition
  13. and self-regulation. MABrookline.
  14. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Brookline
  15. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
  16. Hashemi, L., & Thomas, B. (2009). Objective PET for schools (Practice Test Booklet with Answers). Cambridge University Press.
  17. Hedin, L., Mason, L. H., & Gaffney, J. (2011). TWA plus prompted discourse: Reading comprehension effects for three students with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 55, 148-157.
  18. Housand, A., & Reis, S. M.  (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 108-136. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-865
  19. Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(20), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
  20. Mason, L. H. (2013). Teaching students who struggle with learning to think before, while, and after reading: Effects of self-regulated strategy development instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(2), 124-144. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10573569.2013.758561
  21. Mason, L. H., Dunn Davison, M., Hammer, C. S., Miller, C. A., & Glutting, J. (2012). Knowledge, writing, and language outcomes for a reading comprehension and writing intervention. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(7), 1133-1158.
  22. Mason, L. H., Meadan-Kaplansky, H., Hedin, L., & Corso, L. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for expository text comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603800407
  23. Mason, L. H., Meadan-Kaplansky, H., Hedin, L., & Taft, R.  (2013). Self-regulating informational text reading comprehension: Perceptions of low-achieving students. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 21(2), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.747180
  24. Mbato, C. L. (2013). Facilitating EFL learners' self-regulation in reading: Implementing a
  25. metacognitive approach in an Indonesian higher education context [Master’s thesis, Southern Cross University].
  26. Moos, D. C., & Ringdal, A. (2012). Self-regulated learning in the classroom: A literature review on the teacher’s role. Education Research International, 1(15), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/423284
  27. Mori, S. (2004). Significant motivational predictors of the amount reading by EFL learners in Japan. RELC, 35(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820403500106
  28. Morshedian, M., Hemmat, F., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2017).Training EFL learners in self-regulation of reading: Implementing an SRL model. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1213147
  29. Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
  30. Pallant. J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 12) (2nd ed.). Allen & Unwin.
  31. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
  32. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715-729. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715
  33. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The goal of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). Academic Press.
  34. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  35. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731-810). Springer.
  36. Roohani, A., & Asiabani, S. (2015). Effects of self-reading comprehension and metacognition. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15(3), 31-49.
  37. Roohani, A., Hashemian, M., Asiabani, S. (2016). The effectiveness of strategic instruction on metacognition of EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 11(1), 1-9.
  38. Roohani, A., Hashemian, M., Kazemian, Z. (2017). Effects of rhetorical analysis and self-regulation strategies on Iranian EFL learners’ critical thinking and reading comprehension of argumentative texts. Journal of Language Horizons, 1(1), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2017.8769.1017
  39. Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 57-71. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006
  40. Swalander, L., & Taube, K. (2007). Influences of family-based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2), 206-230. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.01.002
  41. Taylor, L, & Weir, C. J. (2012, May 29- June 3). Automated approaches to establishing context validity in reading tests [Conference session]. The 9th EALTA Conference, Innsbruck: Austria. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/286049534.pdf
  42. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Seidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Academic Press.
  43. Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Springer Science +Business Media B.V.
  44. Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
  45. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-83. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
  46. Zwier, L. (2016). Inside reading: Student book level 2 (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.