Journal of Language Horizons

Submit Manuscript

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

کارکنان اجرایی

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم تعهدنامه

فرم تعارض منافع

راهنمای ثبت داوری در Publons

داوران نشریه در سال 1399

لیست داوران 1400

داوران سال 1401

لیست داوران 1402

بررسی موردی دوره آموزش معلمان توانش‌محور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه ولدا، نروژ

چکیده

بررسی موردی حاضر یک دوره آموزشی نوآورانه با شرکت 14 دانشجو معلم ایرانی مقطع کارشناسی در رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی را گزارش می‌کند. این دوره بر اساس نظریه آموزش معلمان مبتنی بر شایستگی ارزیابی تدریس دانشجو معلم‌ها به ‌وسیلة سه منبع (خود، گروه همتا و مدرس تربیت معلم) و بر اساس ابزار مشاهده معلم طراحی شد. هدف در درجه نخست این بود که ببینیم آیا بین این سه منبع در ارزیابی عملکرد دانشجو معلمان همخوانی وجود دارد و دوماً اینکه بدانیم نگرش شرکت‌کنندگان دوره نسبت به دوره و سه حالت ارزیابی چگونه است. همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که ارزیابی گروه همسالان هم با مدرس تربیت معلم و هم با خود-ارزیابی تااندازه‌ای همخوانی دارد. یافته‌های به‌دست‌آمده از مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ ساختار یافته با دانش‌آموزمعلم‌ها نشان داد که آن‌ها بیشتر از خودارزیابی به ارزیابی گروهی و مدرس تربیت معلم رغبت نشان می‌دهند و این دوره سبب می‌شود که آن‌ها با تأمل بیشتری تدریس کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع
  1.  Almutairi, T. S., & Shraid, N. S. (2021). Teacher evaluation by different internal evaluators: Head of departments, teachers themselves, peers and students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 588-596. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1299262
  2. Al-Mutawa, N., & Al-Dabbous, J. (1997). Evaluation of student teachers’ performance in TEFL practicum at Kuwait University. Journal of the Educational Research Center, 6(11), 27-48. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED435195
  3.  Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment. In Handbook of formative assessment, 90-105. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hivolda-ebooks/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=455487
  4. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302
  5. Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 13–36). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-306-48125-1#page=25
  6. Borgmeier, C., Loman, S. L. & Hara, M. (2016). Teacher self-assessment of evidence-based classroom practices: preliminary findings across primary, intermediate and secondary level teachers, Teacher Development, 20 (1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1105863
  7. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment, 367-393. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hivolda-ebooks/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=1207749
  8. Canh, L. V. (2014). Great expectations: The TESOL practicum as a professional learning experience. TESOL Journal, 5(2), 199-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.103
  9. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
  10. Collier, S.T. (1999). Characteristics of reflective thought during the student teaching experience. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(3), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719905000303
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
  12. Cosh, J. (1999). Peer observation: a reflective model. ELT Journal, 53(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.1.22
  13. Crossley, J., & Jolly, B. (2012). Making sense of work-based assessment: Ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people. Medical Education, 46(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04166.x
  14. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/135580000750052955
  15. Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterising productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005
  16. Deering, T. (2011). How should we evaluate student teachers? Critical Questions in Education, 2(2), 66-73. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1047572.pdf
  17. De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284
  18. Dochy, E., Segers, M., & Sluusmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
  19. Ducharme, E., Ducharme, M., & Dunkin, M. J. (2017). Teacher education: Historical overview, international perspective. https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2479/Teacher-Education.html.
  20. Field, H. (1979). Competency-based teacher education (CBTE): A review of the literature. British Journal of In-Service Education, 6(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305763790060109
  21. Gale, K., Martin, K., & Mcqueen, G. (2002). Triadic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 557–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020318
  22. Gan, Z. (2014). Learning from interpersonal interactions during the practicum: A case study of non-native ESL student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 40(2), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.869969
  23. Gillie, A.C., (1974). Competency-based Teacher Education, American Vocational Journal, 49(4), 1-30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ094266
  24. Greiman, B., & Covington, H. (2007). Reflective thinking and journal writing: Examining student teachers' perceptions of preferred reflective modality, journal writing outcomes, and journal structure. Career and Technical Education Research, 32(2), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.5328/CTER32.2.115
  25. Gulikers, J. T. M., Baartman, L. K. J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2010). Facilitating evaluations of innovative, competence-based assessments: Creating understanding and involving multiple stakeholders. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.002
  26. Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Longman ELT.
  27. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self-and peer assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776
  28. Houston R.W., & Brown, K.W., (1975). Competency-based instructional systems: Past, present and future.  Journal of Industrial teacher Education, 12(4).
  29. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology. Duxbury.
  30. Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K.L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8
  31. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity, and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
  32. Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: The use of authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.751963
  33. Kiliç, D. (2016). An Examination of using self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment in higher education: A case study in teacher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 136-144. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099387
  34. Langan, A.M., Shuker, D.M., Cullen, W.R, Penney, D. Preziosi, R.F., & Wheater, C.P. (2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292498
  35. Leshem, S., & Bar-Hama, R. (2008). Evaluating teaching practice, English Language Teaching Journal, 62(3), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm020
  36. Longhurst, N. & Norton, L.S. (1997). Self-assessment in coursework essays. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 319-330.
  37. Lurie, S. J. (2012). History and practice of competency‐based assessment. Medical education, 46(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04142.x
  38. Magin, D., & Helmore, P. (2001). Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they? Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076264
  39. McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
  40. Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 29(1), 75–100.  https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220809733
  41. Merç, A. (2015). Assessing the performance in EFL teaching practicum: Student teachers’ views. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 44-56. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1060561
  42. Oldfield, K. A. & Macalpine, J. M. K. (1995). Peer and self-assessment at the tertiary level  - an experiential report, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(1), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293950200113
  43. Oren, F. S. (2018). Self, peer and teacher assessments: What is the level of relationship between them? European Journal of Education Studies, 4(7), 1-16. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1661/4293
  44. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210304
  45. Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self and peer assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt224oa
  46. Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65
  47. Rudy, D. W., Fejfar, M. C., Griffith III, C. H., & Wilson, J. F. (2001). Self-and peer assessment in a first-year communication and interviewing course. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 24(4), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327870102400405
  48. Sadeghi, K., & Abolfazli Khonbi, Z. (2015). Iranian university students’ experiences of and attitudes towards alternatives in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 641-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.941324
  49. Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004) Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133oa
  50. Sedumedi, T. D. T., & Mundalamo, F. J. (2012). Understanding field assessment of pre-service teachers on school practicum. Africa Education Review, 9(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2012.755247
  51. Segers, M. & Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in problem-based learning: The value added of the students’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076291
  52. Seifert, T., & Feliks, O. (2019). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 169-185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1487023
  53. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.  Basic Books.
  54. Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660500286333
  55. Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise, and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180306
  56. Stanley, C. (1998). A framework for teacher reflectivity. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 584-587. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588129
  57. Tan, K. H. K. (2012). Student self-assessment. Assessment, learning and empowerment. Singapore: Research Publishing.
  58. Ward, J.R., & McCotter, S. (2004). Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.004
  59. Watts, M., & Lawson, M. (2009). Using a meta-analysis activity to make critical reflection explicit in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.019
  60. Wolffensperger, Y., & Patkin, D. (2013). Self-assessment of self-assessment in a process of co-teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.596925
  61. Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century. Journal of teacher education, 51(1), 39-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248710005100105
Journal of Language Horizons
دوره 7، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 18
اسفند 1402
صفحه 7-36
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار