نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد، مرکز زبان‌ها و زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، مرکز زبان‌ها و زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تحقیق پیش رو موضوع هویت نویسنده را در میان نویسندگان دانشگاهی ایران (از رشته‌های زبان انگلیسی، زیست‌شناسی و مهندسی) مورد مطالعه قرار داده و تاثیر عرف هریک از این رشته‌ها را بر اِعمال موضع نویسندگان مقاله‌های پژوهشی بررسی کرده است. اهداف اصلی این مطالعه در دو مرحلۀ پژوهش پیمایشی و پیکره‌ای محقق شد. ابتدا 150 نفر (50 نویسنده از هر رشته) به پرسشنامۀ هویت نویسنده پاسخ دادند و به دنبال آن، برای بررسی تفاوت هویت نویسنده از منظر نویسندگان این سه رشتۀ دانشگاهی، از تحلیل واریانس یک‌طرفه استفاده شد. سپس در مرحلۀ تکمیلی، نرم افزار اِن‌ویوُ برای انجام پژوهش پیکره‌ای به کار گرفته شد. به منظور بررسی موضع‌گیری نویسندگان دانشگاهی و برای تحلیل پیکره‌ای شامل 90 مقاله از سه رشته‌ی مورد اشاره از مدل تعاملی هایلند (2005) در گفتمان دانشگاهی استفاده شد. یافته‌های حاصل از مثلث‌سازیِ نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که نویسندگان دانشگاهی در گروه زبان تمایل بیشتری به نشان دادن مالکیت اثر، خودبازنمایی و برون‌فکنی خود دارند، در حالی که نویسندگان دانشگاهی در گروه‌های مهندسی و زیست‌شناسی معمولا هویت و صدای خود را از متن حذف می‌کنند و تمایل بیشتری دارند یافته‌هایشان را بدون اشاره به خود ارائه دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Ballantine, J., & McCourt Larres, P. (2012). Perceptions of authorial identity in academic writing among undergraduate accounting students: Implications for unintentional plagiarism. Accounting Education21(3), 289-306.‏
Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), 4-23.‏
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications. ‏
Bazerman, Ch. (2001). Distanced and refined selves: Educational tensions in writing with the power of knowledge. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: Implications and applications (pp. 23-29). University of Birmingham Press.
Bowden, D. (1995). The rise of a metaphor: “Voice”; in composition pedagogy. Rhetoric Review, 14(1), 173-188.
Cheung, K. Y. F., Stupple, E. J., & Elander, J. (2015). Development and validation of the student attitudes and beliefs about authorship Scale: A psychometrically robust measure of authorial identity. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 97-114.
Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). The politics of writing. Routledge.
Clavero, M. (2010). ‘Awkward wording. Rephrase’: Linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 25, 552–553.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
Elbow, P. (1994). What do we mean when we talk about voice in texts? In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Voices on voice: Perspectives, definitions, inquiry (pp. 1-35). National Council of Teachers of English.
Habibie, P., & Hyland, K. (2018). The risks and rewards of scholarly publishing. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp. 1-10)‏. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… in this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics37(8), 1207-1231.‏
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse18(3), 349-382.‏
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes20(3), 207-226.‏
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies7(2), 173-192.‏
Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in final year reports. In K. Hyland & C. G. Sancho (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 134-150). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.‏
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing31, 58-69.
Hyland, K. (2018). The essential Hyland. Bloomsbury.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). ‘We Believe That…’: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics38(2), 139-161.‏
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language12(1), 39-63.
Ivanič, R. (1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education6(1), 3-15.‏
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Benjamin.
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3-33.
Jamshidi, S. (2018). Development and validation of the students’ authorial voice and identity questionnaire (SAVIQ): A multiphase study of authorial identity in the Iranian context (Unpublished master thesis). Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2015). ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies17(5), 529-550.‏
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
Maguire, M., Reynolds, A. E., & Delahunt, B. (2013). Self-efficacy in academic reading and writing, authorial identity and learning strategies in first-year students. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education5(1), 1111-1127.‏
Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 35-53.
Olmos Lopez, P. (2015). A framework for analysis of authorial identity: Heterogeneity among the undergraduate dissertation chapters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/78434.
Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 153-170.
Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Routledge.
Shaw, P., & Liu, E. (1998). What develops in the development of second-language writing? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 225-54.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes18, 23-39.‏
Watts, J. H. (2012). Preparing doctoral candidates for the viva: Issues for students and supervisors. Journal of Further and Higher Education36(3), 371-381.