Journal of Language Horizons

Submit Manuscript

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

کارکنان اجرایی

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم تعهدنامه

فرم تعارض منافع

راهنمای ثبت داوری در Publons

داوران نشریه در سال 1399

لیست داوران 1400

داوران سال 1401

لیست داوران 1402

به کارگیری ارزیابی جایگزین برای تقویت توانایی‌های سازماندهی و کاربردشناختی در تکلیف‌های شفاهی: بررسی بافت انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دانش‌آموخته دکتری، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر برای بررسی اینکه چگونه دانش سازماندهی و کاربردشناختی می‌تواند در نقش عملکرد‌های تکنیک‌های ارزیابی در کلاس درس به کار رود، انجام شد. برای این منظور، تأثیرات تکنیک‌های معلم، همکلاسی و خود-ارزیابی که بر فراهم کردن بازخورد دربارة دانش سازماندهی و کاربردشناختی دانش‌آموزان تمرکز داشتند، مقایسه شدند. تعداد کل ۹۸ زبان‌آموز دختر ایرانی که در سطح پیش- متوسط در یک موسسة زبان در تهران تحصیل می‌کردند، در این پژوهش شرکت کردند. آن‌ها به طور تصادفی به یکی از سه گروه خودارزیابی (تعداد=32)، همکلاسی-ارزیابی (تعداد=33) و معلم-ارزیابی (تعداد=33) دسته‌بندی شدند. توانایی کاربردشناسی با استفاده از ‌ نقش بازی کردن‌‌های شفاهیِ گفتمان و دانش سازماندهی با مقیاسی که دانش دستوری و متنی شرکت‌کنندگان را می‌سنجید، ارزیابی شدند. یافته‌های آزمون واریانس یک‌طرفه نشان داد که خود-ارزیابی سپس ارزیابی با همکلاسی، بر تکنیک ارزیابی معلم در ارتقای توانایی سازماندهی و کاربردشناختی برتری داشت. به طور کلی، یافته‌های به‌دست‌آمده تأییدی برای به‌کارگیری روش‌های جایگزینِ ارزیابی به مثابه ابزارهای آموزشی برای تقویت توانایی زبانی به شمار می‌آید. کاربردهای پژوهش برای آموزش زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی موردِ بحث قرار گرفتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع
  1. Abedi, J. (2010). Adapting performance assessment for English language learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & F. Adamson(Eds.), Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning, (pp. 185-206). John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Abolfazli Khonbi, Z., & Sadeghi, K. (2015). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment: An investigation into Iranian EFL students’ attitudes. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.1.5
  3. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. J. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). Routledge.
  4. Ashraf, H., & Mahdinezhad, M. (2015). The role of peer-assessment versus self-assessment in promoting autonomy in language use: A case of EFL learners. Journal of Language Testing, 5(2), 104-113. https://www.ijlt.ir/journal/images/PDF/437-2015-5-2.pdf
  5. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
  6. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
  7. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.
  8. Beebe, L., & Takahashi, T. (1989). Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts: Chastisement and disagreement. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 199-218). Plenum Press.
  9. Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. C. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language, (pp. 55-73). Newbury House.
  10. Birjandi, P., & Derakhshan, A. (2014). Pragmatic comprehension of apology, request and refusal: An investigation on the effect of consciousness-raising video-driven prompts.  Applied Research on English Language, 3(1), 67-86. https//doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2014.15479
  11. Birjandi, P., & HadidiTamjid, N. (2010). The role of self-assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ motivation. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 211-220. https//doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p211
  12. Birjandi, P., & Siyyari, M. (2010). Self-assessment and peer-assessment: A comparative study of their effect on writing performance and rating accuracy. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 13, 23-45. https://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-44-en.html
  13. Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370
  14. Canale, M. (1983). A communicative approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting. In C. Rivera (Ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: Research and application, (pp. 107-122). Multilingual Matters.
  15. Canale, M. (1984). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication, (pp. 2-27). Longman.
  16. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/i.1.1
  17. Chen, Y. M. (2006). Peer- and self-assessment for English oral performance: A study of reliability and learning benefits. English Teaching and Learning, 30(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.6330/ETL.2006.30.4.01
  18. Coombe, C., Folse, K., & Hubley, N. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. University of Michigan. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.170430
  19. Crooks, T. (2001, September 13-15). The validity of formative assessment [Paper presentation]. The British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds. https://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001862.htm.
  20. Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (4th Ed.). Blackwell.
  21. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, Ch., Barron., B., & Osher, D. (2020) Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development, Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
  22. De Saint-Léger, D. (2009). Self-assessment of speaking skill and participation in foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01013.x
  23. Enochs, K., & Yoshitake-Strain, S. (1999). Evaluating six measures of EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal (JALT), 21(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01013.x
  24. Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2006). Linguistic politeness in Mexico: Refusal strategies among male speakers of Mexican Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(12), 2158-2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004
  25. Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Perceptions of refusals to invitations: Exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness, 17(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146818
  26. Goldman, S., & Pellegrino, J. (2015). Research on learning and instruction: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601866
  27. Grabowski, K. (2013). Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels. In S. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics, (pp. 149-171). Macmillan.
  28. Hariri Asl, M. H., & Marandi, S. (2017). Peer-assessment and student-driven negotiation of meaning: Two ingredients for creating social presence in online EFL social contexts. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 6(1), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.22054/ILT.2017.8421
  29. Harris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings. English Language Teaching (ELT) Journal, 51(1), 12-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.12
  30. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1992). A framework for testing cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report 2). University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
  31. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics, (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
  32. Ifantidou, E. (2013). Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.008
  33. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2014). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge.
  34. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 1-9). Cambridge University Press.
  35. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
  36. Kasper, G., & Youn, S. (2018). Transforming instruction to activity: Role play in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review, 9(4), 589-616. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0020
  37.  Kitsantas, A., Robert, A., & Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: Goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.3200/jexe.72.4.269-287
  38. Lee, I. (2007). Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.1.199
  39. McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815370.pdf
  40. Meisels, S., Atkins-Burnett, S., Xue, Y., & Bickel, D. D. (2003). Creating a system of accountability: The impact of instructional assessment on elementary children’s achievement scores. Educational Policy Analysis Archives. 11(9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n9.2003
  41. Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Pakzadian, S., & Tajeddin, Z. (2014). Dynamic self-assessment: Is it an effective task for pragmatic development and meta pragmatic awareness? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.329
  43. Panadero, E, Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017) Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
  44. Pitsoulakis, D., & Bailey, A. L. (2016, April). Extending learning progressions to self-assessment: Students finding “best fit” for next-steps learning and instruction [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
  45. Poehner, M. E., Davin, K. J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2017). Dynamic assessment. In E. Shohamy, L. G. Or, & S. May (Eds.), Language teaching and assessment, (pp. 243-256). Springer International Publishing.
  46. Purpura, J. (2017). Assessing meaning. In E. Shohamy, L. G. Or, & S. May (Eds.), Language teaching and assessment, (pp. 33-62). Springer International Publishing.
  47. Rahmany, R., Hassani, M. T., & Noroozi Larsari, V. (2013). The role of self-assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ motivation in reading English texts. Life Science Journal, 10(7), 983-988. https://www.lifesciencesite.com
  48. Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
  49. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.
  50. Ross, S. (2005). The impact of assessment method on foreign language proficiency growth. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami011
  51. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social-cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice, (pp. 83-110). Springer-Verlag.
  52. Shams, N., & Tavakoli, M. (2014). The effect of peer, self, and traditional assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 1(1), 29-44.
  53. Shih, K. P., Chen, H. C., Chang, C. Y., & Kao, T. C. (2010). The development and implementation of scaffolding-based self-regulated learning system for e/m-learning. Educational Technology and Society, 13(1), 80-93. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75236/
  54. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2003). The training of peer-assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-491x(03)90003-4
  55. Soleimani, H., & Rahmanian, M. (2014). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in writing improvement: A study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 128-148. https://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_11016_994f2efb124ba6e4ccbddf3a1b517656.pdf
  56. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, (pp. 471-483). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  57. Sykes, I. M. (2013). Learner apologies in Spanish. Technology in Interlanguage Pragmatics Research and Teaching, 36, 71-100. https://benjamins.com/catalog/lllt.36.05syk
  58. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
  59. Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., & Yasaie, H. (2018). Classroom assessment literacy for speaking: Exploring novice and experienced English language teachers’ knowledge and practice. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2018.120601
  60. Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408091655
  61. Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
  62. Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment. DeGruyter Mouton.
  63. Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford University Press.
  64. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning, (pp. 53-82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  65. Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
  66. Wolters, C.  (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance.  Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1
  67. Zarei, A. A., & Usefi, Z. (2015). The effect of assessment type on EFL learners’ goal orientation. Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, 1(4), 112-119. https://www.aiscience.org/journal/j3l
  68. Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, (pp. 49-64). Routledge.
Journal of Language Horizons
دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 11
خرداد 1401
صفحه 53-71
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار