Bio-surveillance and The Immobilizing Journey in The Inheritance of Loss

Taheri, Zahra

doi:10.22051/lghor.2022.33233.1554

Document Type : Research article

Author

Zahra Taheri

Assistant Professor of English Literature, University of Kashan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2022.33233.1554

Abstract

This article focuses on the notion of bio-surveillance in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss (2006) from the perspectives of Ajana and Foucault. It tries to discuss why postcolonial journeying, despite its reputation for upsetting the old colonial paradigms of cultural demarcations, has ended up in the invisible biocitizenship of diasporic figures. To this end, the article elaborates on the biometric measures, ranging from the classic model of Anthropometry to the most advanced biometric technologies, and their deployment at the service of securitization in the center of empire. It is argued that these measures, by keeping the colonial paradigm of otherization intact, have divided society into friends / enemies and, later, reduced the latter into the bare life of invisible biocitizenship. Hence, it can be remarked that postcolonial journeying, despite its apparent dissolution of meta-narratives of identity or cultural geography, underpins the ‘us-versus-them’ binary and proves immobilizing. This means that the open-gate policy cannot wipe out the racist blemish from the West’s reputation since the racism which roots in bodily features (including skin) conducts identity, citizenship, and immigration policies. Hence, racial minorities are always the other, even though their bodies are subject to change.

Keywords

20.1001.1.2588350.2023.7.2.2.2

Main Subjects

English literature

References

Adey, P. (2009). Facing airport security: Affect, biopolitics, and the preemptive securitisation of the mobile body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1068/d0208

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.

Ajana, B. (2013). Governing through biometrics: The biopolitics of identity. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290755

Albritton, L. (2007). [Review of The Inheritance of Loss, by K. Desai]. Harvard Review, 32, 169–171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27569330

Augé, M. (1995). Non- places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. Trans. by John Howe. Verso.

Ball, K., Haggerty, K., & Lyon, D. (2012). Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949

Beer, D. (2014). The biopolitics of biometrics: An interview with Btihaj Ajana. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414546380 .

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.

Casey, E.S. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. University of Indiana Press.

Desai, K. (2006). The Inheritance of Loss. Penguin Group.

Ek R. (2006). Giorgio Agamben and the spatialities of the Camp. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 88(4), 363-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00228.x

Ezard, J. (2006). First-timer beats the odds to take Booker prize that eluded her mother. The Guardian, Wed 11 Oct 2006 02.08. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/oct/11/books.bookerprize2006

Finn, J. (2005). Photographing fingerprints: Data collection and state surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 3(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v3i1.3318

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Ed. Colin Gordon. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. Penguin.

Foucault, M. (2003) [1976]. Society must be defended. In Bertani, M. and Fotana, A. (Eds.), Society must be defended: Lectures at the college de france 1975–1976, Palgrave Macmillan.

Gates, K. (2005). Biometrics and post-9/11 technostalgia. Social Text, 23(2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-23-2_83-35

Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press.

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.

Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Blackwell.

Jackson, E. (2016). Globalization, diaspora, and cosmopolitanism in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss. ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 47(4), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2016.0031

Kaluszynski, M. (2001). Republican identity: Bertillonage as government technique. In J. Caplan & J. Torpey (Eds.), Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world (pp. 123–138). Princeton University Press.

Loh, L. ( 2016). Comparative postcolonial ruralities and English heritage: Julian Barnes’s England and Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature,51(2) 302–315.https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989415627315

Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. John Wiley & Sons.

Masterson, J. (2010). Travel and/as travail: Diasporic dislocations in Abdulrazak Gurnah’s By the Sea and Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 45(3), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989410376223

Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press.

Norris, A. (2000). Giorgio Agamben and the politics of the living dead. Diacritics, 30(4), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2000.0032

Poon, A. (2014). (In)visible scripts, hidden costs: Narrating the postcolonial globe in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 50(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2013.831371

Pugliese, J. (2010). Biometrics: Bodies, technologies, biopolitics. Routledge.

Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856

Sabo, O. (2012). Disjunctures and diaspora in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 47(3), 375-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989412450697

Salter, M. B. (2007). Governmentalities of an airport: Heterotopia and confession. International Political Sociology, 1(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00004.x Shevchenkov, N. A., Olga, O., & Vysotskaya, N. A. (2019). Own-other space: Play with the concept in British and American cross-cultural fiction. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues, 10, 1139–1146. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2019.15196

Siahmansouri, M., & Hoorvash, M. (2020). Heroic West, villainous East: A postcolonial interpretation of narrative structure in Khaled Hosseini’s A Thousand Splendid Suns. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2020.15949

Spielman, D.W. (2010). Solid knowledge’ and contradictions in Kiran Desai’sThe Inheritance of Loss. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 51(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111610903249872

Sunmugam, S. (2015). Identity dilemma in Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable and Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss: A strategic essentialist reading. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.197

Upstone, S. (2009). Spatial politics in the postcolonial novel. Ashgate Publishing.

Zizek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real!: Five essays on September 11 and related dates. Verso.

Journal of Language Horizons

Bio-surveillance and The Immobilizing Journey in The Inheritance of Loss

References

References

Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
September 2023
Pages 33-54

Bio-surveillance and The Immobilizing Journey in The Inheritance of Loss

References

References

Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16September 2023Pages 33-54

Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
September 2023
Pages 33-54