Casting Light on Teacher Recasts: Learner Noticing and Interpretation

Jafarpour Mamaghani, Homa; Zolghaldri, Mandana

doi:10.22051/lghor.2022.38327.1584

Document Type : Research article

Authors

¹ Assistant Professor Department of English Language, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

² Assistant Professor Department of English Language, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2022.38327.1584

Abstract

The role of teacher feedback as a contributor to effective instruction has long been established. However, the types of feedback frequently exploited during English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction and the efficiency of teacher feedback types, addressed in this study, warranted thorough investigation. Moreover, the recasts noticed by learners and the gaps they conveyed were scrutinized to investigate the correspondence between recast types and their interpretation with an eye to learner English proficiency level. To this end, a recast-sensitive teacher’s oral recasts, in four intact communicative English classes, were investigated. To capture the recast episodes, six class sessions were video-recorded, and follow-up stimulated recall interviews on the teachers’ and students’ thoughts and perceptions of each recast were audio-taped. Then the teacher and 31 learners, who had received recasts, were interviewed. The analysis of the coded qualitative data was guided by Nabei and Swain’s (2002) classification of recast types. It revealed that the most frequent recast types were simple, vocabulary-focused, incorporated declarative, direct, and corrective with or without the intention to communicate which also corresponded with the learners’ noticing of the recast. Moreover, chi-square tests indicated that only the linguistic targets were significantly related to learners’ accurate interpretation while the inaccurate learner interpretations were predominantly meaning-focused. The analysis also indicated a positive correspondence between the learners’ English proficiency level and their accurate interpretation of the recasts perceived. The findings have implications for teachers as the results can sensitize them to recast multi-dimensional treatment and their efficient manipulation.

Keywords

20.1001.1.2588350.2023.7.2.3.3

Main Subjects

language teaching

References

Abbuhl, A. (2021). Interactionist approach to corrective feedback in second language acquisition. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 44–64). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.003

Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268

Bailey, K. (2012). Reflective pedagogy. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 23–29). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778.004

Brown, J. D. (2015). Mixed method research. In J. D. Brown & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp.78–84). Cambridge University Press.

Carpenter, H., Jeon, S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060104

Davis, J. McE. (2015). Sampling and what it means. In J. D. Brown & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 198–205). Cambridge University Press.

Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x

Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643

Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310606027X

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. J. (2017). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Han, Z. (2008). On the role of meaning in focus on form. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp.45–79). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690159-006

Han, Z. (2021). Corrective feedback from behaviorist and innatist perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 23–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.002

Hancock, C. (2009). How linguistics can inform the teaching of writing. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J Riley & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The Sage handbook of writing development (pp.194–208). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n14

Hassanzadeh, M., Marefat, F., & Ramezani, A. (2019). The impact of single versus multiple recasts on L2 learners’ implicit and explicit knowledge. Heliyon, 5(5), Article e01748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01748

Havranek, G., & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In H. Foster-Cohen & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook(Vol. 1, pp. 99–122). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.1.10hav

Jackson, D. O. (2021). Language teacher noticing in tasks. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800411241

Kennedy, S. (2010). Corrective feedback for learners of varied proficiency levels: A Teacher’s choices. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1054

Kim, J., & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and Learner interpretation overlap? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 262–297). Oxford University Press. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1991). Language-learning tasks: Teacher intention and learner interpretation. ELT Journal, 45(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.2.98

Leow, R. P., & Driver, M. (2021). Cognitive theoretical perspectives of corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 65–84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.004

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x

Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x

Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon

Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520

Mackey, A. (Ed.). (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford University Press.

Mackey, A., & Bryfonsky, L. (2018). Mixed methodology. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 55–77). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_5

Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: methods and design. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589284

Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research Synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford University Press.

Mackey, A., Perdue, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010

Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x

Myhill, D., Lines, H. & Watson, A. (2012). Making meaning with grammar: a repertoire of possibilities. English in Australia, 47(3), 29–38.

Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667045

Nassaji, H. (2015). Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. Bloomsbury.

Nassaji, H. (2021). Corrective feedback from a sociocultural perspective. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 85–107). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.005

Oliver, R. & Adams, R. (2021). Oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 187–206). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.010

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program (6^th ed.). Open University.

Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000044

Saslow. J., & Ascher, A. (2016). Summit: English for today’s world (3^rd ed.). Pearson Longman.

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr203oa

Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press.

Journal of Language Horizons

Casting Light on Teacher Recasts: Learner Noticing and Interpretation

References

References

Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
September 2023
Pages 55-82

Casting Light on Teacher Recasts: Learner Noticing and Interpretation

References

References

Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16September 2023Pages 55-82

Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
September 2023
Pages 55-82