Journal of Language Horizons

ارسال مقاله

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Executive staff

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Journal Metrics

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Guide for Authors

Ethics Commitment Form

Conflict of Interest

Publons Registration Guide

The Reviewer of the Journal in 2020

List of 2021 Reviewer

Reviewers 2022

Reviewers 2023

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Vision Textbooks: Representation of Social Relations and Ideology

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 MA Graduate, Department of English, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran. abdolhay@qom-iau.ac.ir

2 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Considering the importance of the textbooks within the field of ELT, EFL textbooks should be subjected to for their suitability. Therefore, this article compared three dimensions of meaning (i.e., contents, subject positions, and social relations) in the conversations of the three volumes of the Vision textbook series developed by Iranian educational system. To this end, the theory and procedures of critical discourse analysis, as expounded by Fairclough (1989), were applied to the corpus of the study. The analysis into the dimension of contents revealed that the focus of material developers was more on the topics of everyday and school issues. The analysis into subject positions demonstrated that the material developers had focused more on the student character, with a tinge of gender inequality. The analysis into social relations disclosed their focus on the family and school life relationships for older students, tending to depict male supremacy. Besides, it was revealed that the ideology of Iran centrism had been underscored in the three textbooks thereby focusing on the issue of localization. Finally, two semi-structured interviews were conducted with two material developers of Vision series, which corroborated the CDA results. The findings of this study may have implications for language teachers and material developers.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Alavimogaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. (2016). Vision 1. Ministry of Education.
Alavimogaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. (2017). Vision 2. Ministry of Education.
Alavimogaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. (2018). Vision 3. Ministry of Education.
Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2003). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p134
Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2003). Subliminal sexism in current ESL/EFL textbooks. Asian EFL Journal, 5(1), 1-15. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/subliminal-sexism-in-current-eslefl-textbooks/index.htm
Baleghizadeh, S., & Motahed, M. J. (2010). An analysis of the ideological content of internationally developed British and American ELT textbooks. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 29(2), 1–27. Retrieved from https://tesl.shirazu.ac.ir/article_406_faace25f83d9bfe93ce1f1eb3cb0eeb1.pdf
Bataineh, A. (2020). Analysis of gender bias in two Arabic language textbooks. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(12), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.12.22
Beiki, M., & Gharaguzlu, N. (2017). The analysis of Iranian English school textbook: A CDA study based on Norman Fairclough’s 2001 model. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 55–67. https://www.academia.edu/80426519/The_Analysis_of_Iranian_English_School_Text_Book_A_CDA_Study_Based_on_Norman_Faircloughs_2001_Model
Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2007). The practice of critical discourse analysis: An Introduction.  Routledge.
Chalak, A., & Ghasemi, B. (2017). A critical discourse analysis of four advanced ELT textbooks based on Fairclough's Framework. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8, 60–66.https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.12869
Clarke, J. & Clarke, M. (1990). Stereotyping in TESOL materials. In B. Harrison (Ed.), Culture and the language classroom (pp. 36–42). Macmillan and Modern English Publications.
Cots, J. M. (2006). Teaching “with an attitude”: Critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60(4), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl024
Delshad, J. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of Iranian English textbooks of the 7th grade junior high school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hakim Sabzevari University.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Longman
Hamledari, M. (2017). A comparative analysis of Iranian old and newly-developed junior high-school English textbooks within the Faircloughian framework [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shahrekord University.
Islam, K. M. M., & Asadullah, M. N. (2018). Gender stereotypes and education: A comparative content analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi school textbooks. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0190807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190807
Koupaee Dar, Z., Rahimi, A., & Shams, M. R. (2010). Teaching reading with a critical attitude: Using critical discourse analysis (CDA) to raise EFL university students’ critical language awareness (CLA). International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 3(2), 457–476. https://ijcst.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/ijcst/article/view/30585/28534
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
Monchinski, T. (2008). Critical pedagogy and the everyday classroom. Springer.
Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2008). Gender representation in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 155–173. https://www.neliti.com/publications/243969/gender-representation-in-malaysian-secondary-school-english-language-textbooks
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Siegel, A. (2014). What should we talk about? The authenticity of textbook topics. ELT Journal, 68(4), 363–375. doi:10.1093/elt/ccu012
Taki, S. (2008). International and local curricula: The question of ideology. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084503
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.
Whitehead, D. (2015). Foreword. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (p. 3). British Council.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
Journal of Language Horizons
Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
September 2023
Pages 1-31
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics