The Effect of Web-Based Dynamic Assessment on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners' Pragmatic Knowledge: Apology, Refusal and Request

Ghorbanian, Melika; Ahangari, Saeideh; Saeidi, Mahnaz

doi:10.22051/lghor.2024.44592.1836

The Effect of Web-Based Dynamic Assessment on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners' Pragmatic Knowledge: Apology, Refusal and Request

Document Type : Research article

Authors

¹ Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

² Department of English language, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

10.22051/lghor.2024.44592.1836

Abstract

speech acts, as a main category of pragmatic competence in the success of communication, are considered as one of the important research areas in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT) due to the heed to pragmatic competence as a main component of language competence.As a dominant change in the area of language assessment, the emergence of an assessment procedure, namely dynamic assessment (DA), can be mentioned. This quasi-experimental study sought to investigate the effect of web-based dynamic assessment (WDA) on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' pragmatic knowledge. The participants of this study consisted of 100 female Iranian intermediate EFL learners studying English in one of the private language institutes of Tehran, Iran. They were selected through convenience sampling in the form of five intact classes based on their availability. The Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency (MTELP) and a multiple-choice Written Discourse Completion Test (WDCT), adapted from Birjandi and Rezaei (2010, taken from Tajeddin & Bagherkazemi, 2014) and other WDCTs available in the market, were used to collect the data. For data analysis, descriptive statistics and the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) along with Bonferroni multiple comparisons were run. The results showed that web-based Brown’s graduated prompt approach and Feuerstein’s mediated learning experience (MLE) approach were more effective than the other two models (the Guthke’s learntest approach and the Carlson and Wield’s testing the limits approach) on EFL intermediate learners’ appropriate use of apology, refusal and request. The findings have implications for EFL teachers, learners and curriculum planners.

Keywords

Main Subjects

language teaching

References

Alemi, M. (2015). The impact of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL students’ writing self-assessment. TEL, 9(1), 145-169.

https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2015.53735.

Alibeigloo, H., Ahmadi, H., & Azizmalayeri, F. (2021). The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ speech act production: Does flip type make a difference? Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 3(1), 100-123. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2022.1949219.1350.

Allal, L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of- or in- the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10, 137-152.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00025-.

Alsmari, N. A. (2020). The effect of flipped classroom instruction on developing Saudi EFL learners’ comprehension of conversational implicatures. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(2), 107-127.

https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n2p107.

Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x.

Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the Zone of Proximal Development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022999406564.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001.

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583.

Besharati, F., & Ahmadi, A. (2017). Web-based versus face-to-face interactionist dynamic assessment in essay writing classrooms–a comparative study. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1-29.

Birjandi, P., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Developing a multiple-choice discourse completion test of interlanguage pragmatics for Iranian EFL learners. ILI Language Teaching Journal (Special Issue: Proceedings of the First Conference on ELT in the Islamic World), 6(1, 2), 43-58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262187648.

Bracket, M. A., Palomera, R., Mojsa-Kaja, J., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2010). Emotion-regulation ability, burnout, and job satisfaction among British secondary-school teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 406–417.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20478.

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1984). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1861.001.0001.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.

Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.

Campione, J.C., & Brown, A.L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-115). Guilford.

https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(92)90011-3.

Davoudi, M., & Ataie-Tabar, M. (2015). The effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 writing on Iranian EFL learners' writing development. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 3(2), 176-186.

https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v3n2a16.

Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2016). Exploring transcendence in EFL learners’ reading comprehension through computerized dynamic assessment. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 27-45 27.

https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2016.20376.

Emezue, C. (2022). Digital or digitally delivered responses to domestic and intimate partner violence during COVID-19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Fani, T., & Rashtchi, M. (2015). Dynamic assessment of reading comprehension ability: Group or individualized. Education Journal, 4(6), 325-331.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125231182269.

Feuerstein, R., Falik, L. H., & Feuerstein, R. S. (2010). Beyond Smarter: Mediated learning and the brain's capacity for change. Teachers College Press.

Feuerstein, R. Y. (2000). Mediated learning experience, instrumental enrichment, and the learning propensity assessment device. In Mediated learning experience: Theoretical, empirical, and practical considerations (Chapter 22). Retrieved from https://www.icdl.com/graduate/documents/Chapter22.pdf.

Feuerstein, R. (2003). Feuerstein’s theory of cognitive modifiability and mediated learning. In M. Shayer & P. Adey (Eds.), Educational psychology: A practitioner-researcher approach (pp. 59-60). Routledge.

Feuerstein, R., Falik, L., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modiﬁability. ICELP Press.

Feuerstein, R., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. University Park Press, Baltimore.

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don’t accept me as I am. Helping retarded performers excel. Plenum.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2003). CERQ: Manual for the use of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. DATEC.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141.

Guthke, J. (1977). Assessment of intellectual learning potential. VEB DeutcherVerlag der Wissenschafen.

Guthke, J., Heinrich, A., & Caruso, M. (1986). The diagnostic program of syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition: A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning ability. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 903-911). Elsevier Science.

Guthke, J. (1992). Learning tests: The concept, main research findings, problems and trends. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 17-50). Springer-Verlag.

Haghighi, M., Jafarigohar, H., Khoshsima, M., & Vahdany, F. (2018). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners' appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083.

Hessamy, G., & Ghaderi, E. (2014). The role of dynamic assessment in the vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98(4), 645-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.463.

Isman, E. B., & Tzuriel, D. (2008). The mediated learning experience (MLE) in a three generational perspective. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(4), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007x269786.

Jan, M., Soomro, S., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Impact of social media on self-esteem. European Scientific Journal, 13(23), 329-341.

https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p329.

Jarrahzade, Z., & Tabatabaei, O. (2014). Gender-based study of learners' reading ability through dynamic assessment (DA): Guthke's Lerntest approach in focus. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(7), 47-53.

Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics, in Spencer-Oatey, H. (ed.) Culturally speaking (pp. 316–341). Continuum.

https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934085.ch-014.

Katchamat, P. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom instruction on appropriacy of English apology by Thai EFL learners. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education (IJPTE), 2, 113-124.

https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.25142.

Khoshsima, H., & Farokhipours, S. (2016). On the role of different models of dynamic assessment on promoting speaking. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(4), 586-600.

Knodel, M. K. (1997). Dynamic assessment of written language. [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary].

Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M.E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian Praxis for L2 development. Language teaching research, 15(11), 11-33.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328.

Leech, G. (1983). The principles of pragmatics. Longman.

https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207.

Matsumoto, Y. (2002). Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 21(2-3), 139–172.

https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207.

Mendes, M., & Martins, M. (2022). (Mis) Guided interpersonal deictic choices in primary school writing under language assessment. Linguistics and Education, 69, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101035.

Mohammadimoghadam, M. (2015). Effects of mediation on an EFL learner’s grammar development: A case study of an EFL beginner student. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 101–106.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.015.

Mohsen, M. A., & Shafeeq, C. P. (2014). EFL teachers' perceptions on Blackboard applications. English Language Teaching, 7(11), 108-118.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n11p108.

Mohseni Tabrizi, A., Keldi, A., & Javadianzadeh, M. (2011). Investigating the state of domestic violence in married women referring to forensic medicine and welfare centers in Yazd city in 2009. Toloe Behdasht Quarterly, 11(3), 11-24.

URL: http://tbj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-321-en.html.

Moranski, K., & Kim, F. (2016). Flipping lessons in a multi-section Spanish course: Implications for assigning explicit grammar instruction outside of the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 830-852.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44981249.

Mosleh, S. M., Kasasbeha, M. A., Aljawarneh, Y. M., Alrimawi, I., & Saifan, A. R. (2022). The impact of online teaching on stress and burnout of academics during the transition to remote teaching from home. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03496-3.

Naeini, J. (2015). A comparative study of the effects of two approaches of dynamic assessment on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.54.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Springer Publishing.

Olyaei, S., Zamanian, M., & Afraz, Sh. (2020). Exploring the effects of incorporated personal response system (PRS) on Iranian learners’ motivation and participation. Journal of Language and Translation, 10(3), 35-46.

https://doi.org/10.30495/ttlt.2020.678753.

Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491.

https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa.

Radia, B. (2019). Approaching a reading course via Moodle-based blended learning: EFL learners' insights. MJLTM, 9(11), 700-721.

Sadri, Z., Allami, H., & Rezai, M. J. (2018). Telephone conversation closing strategies used by Persian speakers: Rapport management approach. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 6(21), 21-40.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech act. Oxford University Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge university press.

Tajeddin, Z., & Bagherkazemi, M. (2014). Short-term and long-term impacts of individual and collaborative pragmatic output on speech act production. Teaching English Language, 8(1), 141-166.

Tajeddin, Z., & Tayebipour, F. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL learners’ acquisition and apology. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 4(2), 87-118.

https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2012.499.

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet psychology, 27(2), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405270253.

Harraqi, M. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20170203.13.

Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., & Salehi, Z. (2013). The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in teaching ESL writing skills. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n7p1.