Document Type : Research article
Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Associate Professor, Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Assistant Professor, English Department, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
Over recent decades, second language acquisition (SLA) researchers have considered attention an important cognitive process mediating second language (L2) learning. The concept of noticing as conscious attention to form has become especially important in the field. The present study explored whether two pedagogical interventions, namely textual input enhancement (TIE) and learners’ output production (LOP), in isolation and in combination, promoted learners’ noticing and learning of English relative clauses (RC). The study was conducted with a sample of 113 freshmen majoring in English language and literature. The participants were assigned to three experimental groups and the control group based on the treatments they received, +TIE+LOP, +TIE-LOP, -TIE+LOP, and -TIE-LOP. Before treatment, all the participants took a test of English RCs as the pretest. Then, the participants were required to read the reading texts including instances of RCs and take note. While the participants in the +TIE groups read the enhanced input, the participants in the -TIE groups received the unenhanced input. Also, the participants in the +LOP groups were required to carry out output tasks, but the participants in the -LOP groups answered comprehension questions. Consequently, the participants took part in think-aloud processes. Finally, the test of RCs was administered again as the posttest. The findings revealed that LOP positively affected the participants’ noticing and learning of RCs. However, TIE was only effective in promoting the participants’ noticing, but not learning, of RCs.
- Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule representation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). University of Hawaii Press.
- Amini, D., Amini, M., & Naseri Maleki, F. (2019). Investigating noticing in narrative writing tasks and its effect on EFL learners’ writing performance. Applied Research on English Language, 8(3), 365-382. http:// doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.115769.1437
- Bowles, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. Routledge.
- Cho, M. Y. (2010). The effects of input enhancement and written recall on noticing and acquisition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 71-87. http:// doi.org/10.1080/17501220903388900
- Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 31-469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010287
- Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
- Garcia Mayo, M. D. P., & Labandibar, U. L. (2017). The use of models as written corrective feedback in English as foreign language (EFL) writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 110-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000071
- Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Erlbaum.
- Hama, M. (2012). Strategic planning, recasts, noticing, and L2 development [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.
- Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597-618. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn010
- Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 459-479. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362168807080963
- Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 332-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.008
- Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL Revitalization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004023
- Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing in second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 239-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587952
- Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, F., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 421-452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003034
- Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty. C. (1995). Does textual enhancement prmote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-216). University of Hawaii.
- LaBrozzi, R. M. (2014). The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 75-91. http://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362168814561903
- Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL student’s reading comprehension and learning of passive voice. Language Learning, 57(1), 87-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x
- Leow, R. P. (1997). Attention, awareness and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47(3), 467-505.
- Leow, R. P. (2001). Attention, awareness and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51(1), 13-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00016.x
- Leow, R. P., Egi, T., Nuevo, A. M., & Tsai, Y. C. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13(2), 93-108.
- Loewen, S., & Inceoglu, S. (2016). The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 89-110. http:// doi.org/ 10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.5
- Naseri, E., & Khodabandeh, F. (2019). Comparing the impact of audio-visual input enhancement on collocation learning in traditional and mobile learning contexts. Applied Research on English Language , 8(3), 383-422. http:// doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.115716.1434
- Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2014). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge.
- Overstreet, M. H. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
- Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on noticing the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000044
- Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7
- Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the noticing hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), 83-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x
- Rosa, E., & O’Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511-556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004015
- Russell, V. (2014). A closer look at the output hypothesis: The effect of pushed output on noticing and inductive learning of the Spanish future tense. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 25-47. http://doi.org/ 10.1111/flan.12077
- Sarkhosh, M., Taghipour, B., & Sarkhosh, H. (2013). Diffedrential effect of different textual enhancement formats on intake. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70(2), 544-559. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.092
- Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
- Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.
- Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.005
- Simard, D., & Wong, W. (2001). Alertness, orientation and detection. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101001048
- Song, M. (2007). Getting learners’ attention: Typographical input enhancement, output, and their combined effects. English Teaching, 62(2), 193-215. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.62.2.200706.193
- Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Madden (Ed.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.
- Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In B. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford University Press.
- Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teachning and learning (pp. 471-484). Erlbaum.
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371
- Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012870
- Uggen, M. S. (2012). Reinvestigating the noticing function of output. Language Learning, 62(2), 506-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00693.x
- VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, commentary (pp. 5-32). Erlbaum.
- White, J. (1998). Getting the learner’s attention. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition classroom (pp. 85-113). Cambridge University Press.
- Winke, P. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension: A modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000903